Trump, Drones, and the Egg-shaped UFOs: What’s Really Going On?
From UFO whistleblowers to political promises, this story raises questions about who benefits.
Jake Barber, a decorated U.S. Air Force veteran and contractor in aerospace and defense, has shared a story that feels like it’s straight out of a sci-fi movie—except he says it’s all real. He claims to have witnessed a UAP crash retrieval involving not just one, but two unusual craft: an egg-shaped object and another he calls the "8gon" craft, which had properties unlike anything we understand. According to Barber, the crash site emitted dangerous radiation and even involved psionic (mental) abilities to engage with the craft.
Barber’s story exploded into public view after NewsNation aired an exclusive special on his claims. That special has racked up over 1.6 million views on YouTube—their most-watched video ever. Ross Coulthart, a well-respected journalist who has built a reputation investigating UAPs, has stood behind Barber’s account, adding a layer of credibility to the extraordinary claims. In our previous analysis, we examined the potential for Barber’s story to be part of a larger psychological operation (PSYOP). If you haven’t read that yet, it’s a good starting point to understand how narratives like this can shape public perception. These details, combined with Barber’s background in defense contracting, have sparked a wave of public curiosity and debate about what it all means.
New Developments: Egg-Shaped Object Photos Spark Debate
Since Barber’s story first aired, new photos and claims of similar egg-shaped objects have surfaced online, appearing on platforms like Reddit and 4Chan. These images, purportedly taken in a cave, feature hieroglyphic-like markings and have sparked heated debates in UFO communities. At first glance the claims look like pure fiction but some analysts have pointed to subtle photographic details as signs of authenticity, skeptics argue the lack of source verification undermines their credibility. This new development adds another layer to the narrative Barber first brought to light, keeping the conversation alive and evolving.
Drones, UAPs, and Political Agendas
This all comes at a time when drones have dominated recent headlines, with stories of incursions along the East Coast stirring public concern. However, these drone narratives are increasingly being conflated with UAPs, both by NewsNation and the broader UFO influencer community. President Trump’s recent promise to release information about drone incursions within 24 hours of taking office adds yet another layer of intrigue and tension.
Rethinking the Question
But here’s something to think about: asking whether Barber is telling the truth might not be the right question. What if Barber is recounting his experience as honestly as possible, but his story is being used as part of a bigger narrative? One that’s shaping how we view UAPs, drones, and even the power structures around us?
So instead of debating Barber’s honesty, let’s explore something more productive: who stands to benefit from this story?
Let’s Explore Who Benefits
I’ve ranked these possibilities based on supporting evidence. But keep in mind: it’s not about choosing one explanation. Multiple entities could benefit, and a feedback loop might amplify those benefits across different groups.
1. Media Outlets (e.g., NewsNation)
Why They Might Benefit: NewsNation has made UAPs a cornerstone of their content strategy, and it’s working. Their Jake Barber special has outperformed every other video on their channel, with 1.6 million views compared to their next most popular video at 251k. Promising to release extended interviews on figures like Dr. John Blitch, Don Paul, and Fred Baker (who support Barber’s claims) shows they’re betting on this story to sustain engagement.
What Could Happen Next:
Release of the full Jake Barber interview with new claims or details.
Features linking Barber’s story to other drone or UAP narratives.
Efforts to tie UAPs to broader societal or national security issues to maintain relevance.
What to Watch For:
Are they presenting credible, verifiable evidence or relying on sensationalism?
Does their coverage subtly align with hidden agendas or deflect attention from other issues?
2. Political Figures or Groups (e.g., Trump Administration)
Why They Might Benefit: Trump has promised to release information about drone incursions within 24 hours of taking office. Aligning with the UAP disclosure movement could energize voters who see him as a transparency advocate.
What Could Happen Next:
Increased mentions of drone or UAPs in Trump’s speeches or campaign materials.
Appointments of officials viewed as sympathetic to disclosure efforts.
What to Watch For:
Does Trump deliver on his promises, or is the narrative used as a distraction?
Are voters motivated by his stance on disclosure?
3. UFO Enthusiast Communities and Influencers
Why They Might Benefit: If the story gains traction, it lends credibility to the broader UFO disclosure movement and creates momentum for their efforts. The recent emergence of egg-shaped object photos on Reddit and other platforms has reignited interest, providing influencers and community leaders with fresh material to analyze and promote.
What Could Happen Next:
Influencers amplify Barber’s claims as a major step toward disclosure, potentially linking the new photos to his narrative.
Increased activity in forums, conferences, and social media, driven by debates over the authenticity and implications of the leaked images.
Possible additional leaks or claims that build on the momentum of the photos.
What to Watch For:
Are credible experts stepping in to validate or debunk the newly surfaced images?
Is there a growing trend of tying these photos directly to Barber’s claims?
Does this surge in attention create divisions within the community, or does it strengthen the overall disclosure movement?
4. Private Companies (e.g., Skywatchers LLC, Anduril, Palantir)
Why They Might Benefit: Newer private companies like Skywatchers LLC may use this story to establish credibility and secure contracts. Startups and smaller players often leverage high-profile narratives to enter competitive spaces. Meanwhile, established firms like Anduril and Palantir could benefit from increased government spending on advanced detection technologies or counter-UAP systems.
What Could Happen Next:
Skywatchers LLC announces partnerships or projects tied to drone or UAP investigations.
Anduril or Palantir push technologies framed as essential for countering drones or UAPs.
Increased lobbying by these companies for government spending on related programs.
What to Watch For:
Are newer companies gaining visibility or contracts through their involvement?
Do established contractors use drone or UAP narratives to justify new defense initiatives?
Is there a clear push for government funding tied to these technologies?
5. Military-Industrial Complex
Why They Might Benefit: Stories about advanced non-human craft justify increased defense spending on counter-drone programs and technology development. Established defense contractors like Lockheed Martin or Raytheon are well-positioned to benefit from large-scale government initiatives.
What Could Happen Next:
Calls for higher budgets tied to national security threats from drones or UAPs.
New contracts for major defense and aerospace companies.
What to Watch For:
Are drones or UAPs framed as security risks in official statements?
Do contractors push for UAP-related programs?
6. Government Agencies (e.g., Intelligence or Defense)
Why They Might Benefit: Agencies could use this story to manage public perception or obscure classified operations.
What Could Happen Next:
Controlled disclosures that maintain secrecy while appearing transparent.
Conflicting narratives to distract from other issues.
What to Watch For:
Do agencies release vague or incomplete evidence?
Are disclosures timed to divert attention from controversies?
Who do you think stands to benefit from this narrative?
Every new detail offers an opportunity to sharpen our thinking and refine our understanding of who might stand to benefit from the narratives surrounding UAPs, drones, and Jake Barber’s claims.
As you follow these developments, challenge yourself to think critically about the motivations behind the stories you encounter. Who gains credibility, power, or resources from the attention these narratives generate? Are we seeing evidence of deliberate engineering, accidental alignment of interests, or something else entirely?
Let’s keep asking questions and looking for patterns as the story unfolds. Who do you think stands to benefit from this narrative? What possibilities did I miss? Join the conversation and help separate the signal from the noise.
The truth might be out there—but finding it will take curiosity, critical thinking, and a willingness to stay open as the story evolves.